Hizbullah responds to Jumblatt: We do not need a testimony from an addict to ups and downs

Source: Assafir, 29-4-2006
Hizbullah deputy secretary-general sheikh Naeem Qassem called for abstaining from promoting America and her capabilities, alongside international resolutions and their implementation, indicating that there are those who beg for them as a way to help them gain an edge over others inside the country.
He drew attention to how America used those who stood beside her as instruments and how none of those that walked beside scored any triumphs.
In a celebration jointly held by the society for Islamic religious education and Al Mostafa schools in Lebanon sheikh Qassem said: "We heard some boast about having de-sanctified the resistance by entering it into the list of topics for debate, considering that a great achievement worthy of making them feel proud.
What we say, to this some and to whoever is behind them, directing and orchestrating, that the resistance remains sacred, noble, strong and ever ready, impossible for a few screeches and accusations to topple it from its position."
Meanwhile MP Ali Ammar, a member of the Loyalty to Resistance Bloc in a reply to statements made by MP Walid Jumblatt and Cabinet Minister Marawan Hamada, he said "the culture of verbal panorama used by MP Jumblatt against others, only reflects and describes where he himself is at on the political behaviour level. Indications show he has become and alterations addict, who regularly crosses the political floor back and forth from one side to the other".
He added that the peak of political foolishness was categorized as one of violating sanctities, destroying national fortresses, defaming personalities and symbols, the most prominent of which is the resistance and its leadership, whose sound strategy together with its history of accurate and correct stands, need no testimony from any alterations and instability addict.
By making a habit of slinging accusations against those opposing the American project in Lebanon; this gloomy group raises its tone whenever their project runs into stumbling blocks. Whenever a feeling of potential loss of their stakes rises, this group regresses into the use of strained language and accusations only to justify the dilemma it finds itself in.
It is not hidden which team practices wagering on outside forces, according to shifts in his situation; he does not and has not worked except under the mentality of being a tool and a political consumerist.
Jumblatt`s opposition to the dialogue is still remembered in Lebanon as a whole additional to some of Jumblatt`s partners, both at the dialogue table and away from it. No one has forgotten his attempt to blow it up from his teacher`s platform at the White House.
What`s more bewildering is the insistence of both Jumblatt and Hamada on veiling the basic targets the enemy holds in Lebanon, overlooking the past and present crimes committed by this enemy against the icons of sovereignty and freedom of Lebanon. Moreover the exchange of "Israel`s" enmity with planting enmity against Arabism and Syria, since its presence in Lebanon was exploited by Walid Jumblatt to the degree of intoxication.